Neurointerventions as criminal rehabilitation

An ethical review

Authored by: Jonathan Pugh , Thomas Douglas

The Routledge Handbook of Criminal Justice Ethics

Print publication date:  July  2016
Online publication date:  July  2016

Print ISBN: 9780415708654
eBook ISBN: 9781315885933
Adobe ISBN: 9781134619450

10.4324/9781315885933.ch6

 Download Chapter

 

Abstract

According to a number of influential views in penal theory, 1 one of the primary goals of the criminal justice system is to rehabilitate offenders. Rehabilitative measures are commonly included as part of a criminal sentence. For example, in some jurisdictions judges may order violent offenders to attend anger management classes or to undergo cognitive behavioural therapy as a part of their sentences. In a limited number of cases, neurointerventions—interventions that exert a direct biological effect on the brain—have been used as aids to rehabilitation. For instance, in certain jurisdictions drug-addicted offenders are required to take medications that are intended to attenuate their addictive desires. 2 In other jurisdictions, sex-offenders may receive testosterone-lowering drugs (sometimes referred to as “chemical castration”) as a part of their criminal sentence or as required by their conditions of parole; 3 these interventions are intended to suppress the recipients’ sex drive and thus reduce the risk of recidivism amongst this group of offenders.

 Cite
Search for more...
Back to top

Use of cookies on this website

We are using cookies to provide statistics that help us give you the best experience of our site. You can find out more in our Privacy Policy. By continuing to use the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.