Enviromateriality

Exploring the links between political ecology and material culture studies

Authored by: José E. Martínez-Reyes

Routledge Handbook of Environmental Anthropology

Print publication date:  August  2016
Online publication date:  August  2016

Print ISBN: 9781138782877
eBook ISBN: 9781315768946
Adobe ISBN: 9781317667964

10.4324/9781315768946.ch6

 Download Chapter

 

Abstract

In a review article comparing ecological anthropology and material culture studies, Tim Ingold wonders why both fields have always dealt with materials and material culture, yet their practitioners ‘are speaking past one another in largely incommensurate theoretical languages’ (Ingold 2012: 427). While the field of material culture studies focuses upon how ‘persons and things are bound in relational networks’, ecological anthropology emphasizes how ‘human beings and other organisms are bound in webs of life’ (Ingold 2012: 428). His solution for solving the impasse between both is that they should ‘focus on the active materials that compose the lifeworld’ (Ingold 2012: 429). While I agree with some of the main arguments that Ingold espouses above, I am left wondering – what about political ecology? Here I refer to political ecology as a part of environmental anthropology with a particular focus on power and conflicts over access to and use of resources. As I discuss below, the field of material culture studies has effectively incorporated a critical political economy of consumption and materiality, but has neglected environmental resource conflicts. On the other hand, political ecology (with few exceptions) has neglected materiality as an important dimension of human–environmental relations.

 Cite
Search for more...
Back to top

Use of cookies on this website

We are using cookies to provide statistics that help us give you the best experience of our site. You can find out more in our Privacy Policy. By continuing to use the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.