Detecting Candidate Preknowledge and Compromised Content using Differential Person and Item Functioning

Authored by: Lisa S. O’Leary , Russell W. Smith

Handbook of Quantitative Methods for Detecting Cheating on Tests

Print publication date:  October  2016
Online publication date:  October  2016

Print ISBN: 9781138821804
eBook ISBN: 9781315743097
Adobe ISBN: 9781317588108

10.4324/9781315743097.ch7

 Download Chapter

 

Abstract

Item compromise is a consistent threat to the validity of certification examinations due to prevalent piracy practices that include the regular theft and unauthorized release of individual items, entire item pools, and exam forms. It has been documented that item compromise is widespread within information technology certification exams in particular; live exam content and items are routinely being exposed on the Internet. The three basic outlets for legitimate and illegitimate advice and content are: exam preparation sites, Internet auction sites, and braindump sites that either formally sell stolen content or informally encourage candidates to share their own recollections about particular certification exams (Smith, 2004; Foster, 2013). According to research (Maynes, 2009) within some high-volume certification testing programs, a majority of candidates (i.e., 85% or more) may have acquired prior item knowledge by purchasing content through braindump sites.

 Cite
Search for more...
Back to top

Use of cookies on this website

We are using cookies to provide statistics that help us give you the best experience of our site. You can find out more in our Privacy Policy. By continuing to use the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.