Learning from failure

Egypt

Authored by: Robert Springborg

The Routledge Handbook of Civil–Military Relations

Print publication date:  September  2012
Online publication date:  November  2012

Print ISBN: 9780415782739
eBook ISBN: 9780203105276
Adobe ISBN: 9781136253218

10.4324/9780203105276.ch8

 Download Chapter

 

Abstract

Militaries reacted to the “Arab Spring” uprisings of 2011 in a variety of ways: By stepping aside to facilitate a transition to democracy, as in Tunisia; by attempting, with greater or lesser success and degrees of fragmentation, to defend the incumbent regime, as in Libya, Yemen, Syria, and Bahrain; or, as in the case of Egypt, by seizing power, at least temporarily, in what may be termed a “coup-volution”—a preemptive coup intended to abort the further intensification of conflict and at least preserve, if not upgrade, the military's privileged political and economic position. 1 As the hyphenated term suggests, the Egyptian military's intervention did not appear to be a traditional coup, in that military leaders declared they were acting on behalf of the protesters and pledged to facilitate a speedy transition to civilian democracy. Unique, at least for the Middle East, this “coup-volution” provides novel evidence for the study of civil–military relations in a region in which militaries have been described as “ruling but not governing.” 2

 Cite
Search for more...
Back to top

Use of cookies on this website

We are using cookies to provide statistics that help us give you the best experience of our site. You can find out more in our Privacy Policy. By continuing to use the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.